Relationship Memory
RevenueOS remembers how each counterparty behaves so recovery is relationship-aware.
ABC Legal
“Relationship is deteriorating: days to pay 38 → 67 and 3 broken promises in 90 days. Require manager review before new terms.”
- Why
- Health 41 (Watch); 67-day average payment vs portfolio benchmark; promise reliability 64%.
- Evidence
- 1 kept / 3 broken promises · 7 cases · 5 payments · 2 disputes logged
- Trend
- Deteriorating — days to pay 38 (12M) → 67 (30D); health 62 → 41
- Recommended handling
- Involve a manager, confirm commitments in writing and tighten terms.
0–100 · 80+ Strong · 60–79 Stable · 40–59 Watch · under 40 High Risk
- Payment behavior67 days avg ▼
- Promise reliability64% ▼
- Responsiveness48% ▼
- Dispute frequencyModerate ▼
- Escalation historyNone logged ▲
- Exposure$1.7M ▲
- TrendDeteriorating ▼
- Relationship tenure9 years (illustrative) ▲
- Pays on time
- Rarely
- Average delay
- 67 days
- Promise reliability
- 64%
- Most responsive channel
- SMS
- Average response time
- 5.1 hours (illustrative)
- Disputes
- Moderate
- Escalation frequency
- Low
- SMS100%From logged outcomes
- Voice75%From logged outcomes
- Email67%From logged outcomes
- Human Relationship Manager70%Illustrative
- SMS
- Voice follow-up
- Email with documentation
- Relationship manager call
1 open · 3 broken in last 90 days · reliability 64%
RevenueOS recommends: Involve a manager, confirm commitments in writing and tighten terms.
- Tone
- Formal; confirm every commitment in writing
- Channel
- SMS first, then Voice follow-up
- Escalation threshold
- Immediate manager review on next miss
- Human involvement
- Manager on next contact
- Next best action
- Manager call to reset commitments
- Automation eligibility
- Restricted — manager approval per step
Relationship memory informs recommendations but never overrides legal, contact-permission or quiet-hour policy.
- Manager ReviewDerived · Health 41 · trend deteriorating
- High ExposureDerived · Total exposure 1.7M
- Repeat Broken PromiseDerived · 3 broken promises in 90 days
- DeterioratingDerived · Days to pay 38 → 67; health 62 → 41
| Contact | Role | Phone | Preferred | Last interaction | Response behavior | Permission | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Kaplan | Lead attorney | (555) 0110-0921 | james.kaplan@abc-legal.example | SMS | 2026-10-07 · Human Call | Typical for firm | All channels permitted |
| Susan Young | Attorney | (555) 0110-1391 | susan.young@abc-legal.example | SMS | — | Typical for firm | All channels permitted |
| ABC Accounting | Accounts payable | (555) 0190-0000 | ap@abc.example | SMS | — | Responds to SMS status checks | All channels permitted |
Contact details are fictional demo data.
Two missed promises this quarter. Confirm every commitment in writing and involve a manager before granting new terms.
Marcus Lee (Relationship Manager) · 2026-09-24
- What RevenueOS found
- ABC Legal responds 48% of the time, fastest on SMS (avg 5.1 hours (illustrative)).
- Why
- Response rate blends the profile baseline with every logged outcome since.
- Evidence
- SMS 100% · Voice 75% · Email 67% · Human Relationship Manager 70%
- 2 disputes logged
- Impact
- Fewer unanswered touches and faster commitments.
Answers are built from the live shared records on this page.
Relationship timeline
Payments, promises, calls, SMS, emails, disputes, escalations, cases and relationship-manager interactions.
- 2026-10-07CallHuman Call · Contacted · G-31147Reached firm contact; follow-up noted
- 2026-10-07EmailEmail · Promise · G-30921Firm committed to a payment date
- 2026-10-07SMSSMS · Promise · G-31373Firm committed to a payment date
- 2026-10-07EmailEmail · No answer · G-30808No answer · message left
- 2026-10-07SMSSMS · Dispute · G-31260Firm disputed balance or settlement terms
- 2026-10-07SMSSMS · Contacted · G-31147Reached firm contact; follow-up noted
- 2026-10-07CallAI Call · Contacted · G-31373Reached firm contact; follow-up noted
- 2026-10-07SMSSMS · Contacted · G-31034Reached firm contact; follow-up noted
- 2026-10-07SMSSMS · Dispute · G-30808Firm disputed balance or settlement terms
- 2026-10-07CallAI Call · No answer · G-31260No answer · message left
- 2026-10-07PaymentPayment $21,500 receivedCheck #85023
- 2026-10-07PaymentPayment $26,550 receivedCheck #85043
Deterioration detection
Alerts when days to pay rise, reliability or response falls, exposure rises or disputes increase.
- Days to pay 38 → 67
- Relationship 62 → 41
- Broken promises: 3 in 90 days
Compare relationships
Side-by-side memory — feeds the future Risk Intelligence module.
| Exposure | $2,400,000 | $1,700,000 |
| Open AR | $418,000 | $640,000 |
| Days to pay | 31 | 67 |
| Promise reliability | 92% | 64% |
| Response | 84% | 48% |
| Relationship health | 86 · Strong | 41 · Watch |
| Trend | Stable | Deteriorating |